#Who Was Arminius Free Will Of#

Arminius was born Octoand died on October 19, 1609.Arminius returned to Amsterdam in 1588 to become a minister in the Dutch Reformed Church. Romans 9 stands as the watershed passage used to support Calvinism.Jacob Arminius was a Christian theologian and philosophy professor who is best known for his teachings, commonly called Arminianism, which are often discussed as an alternative to Calvinism, which is the traditional articulation of the theology of John Calvin.Arminius (German: Hermann 18/17 BC AD 21) was a chieftain of the Germanic Cherusci tribe and a former officer in the Roman military.An auxiliary lieutenant to the Roman general Publius Quinctilius Varus, Arminius used his knowledge of Roman tactics to lead an allied coalition of Germanic tribes to a decisive victory against three Roman legions and their auxiliaries in the historic Battle. Unless otherwise noted, all citations are generously taken from the New American Standard Bible (NASB). Who was this ArminiusRomans 9: An Arminian Interpretation. His fame is a great irony since the Dutch Reformed Church historically was a bastion of strict Calvinism, and Arminius has given his name to a movement very much in opposition to historic Calvinism. James Arminius (Jacob Harmenszoon) is undoubtedly the most famous theologian ever produced by the Dutch Reformed Church.

During the fifteen years which he spent here, he gained general respect, but his views underwent a change. There Arminius lectured on the philosophy of Petrus Ramus and the Epistle to the Romans.Recalled by the government of Amsterdam, in 1588 Arminius was appointed preacher of the Reformed congregation. He eventually continued his studies at Geneva and Basel under Theodore Beza and Grynmus. In 1576 he returned home and studied theology at Leyden under Lambertus Danmus. Arminus and Calvin did not know each other Arminius was four-years-old when Calvin died.After his father's early death, Arminius lived with Rudolphus Snellius, a professor in Marburg.

Arminius' Teachings about ChristArminius was suspected of heresy because he regarded the subscription to the symbolical books as not binding and was ready to grant to the State more power in ecclesiastical matters than the strict Calvinists would admit.When two of the professors of the University of Leyden, Junius and Trelcatius, died (1602), the curators called Arminius and Franciscus Gomarus (q.v.), the only surviving theological professor, protested, but he became reconciled after an interview with Arminius. Disputes arose in the consistory, which for the time being were stopped by the burgomasters. His learned but hot-headed colleague, Petrus Plancius, in particular opposed him.

The Calvinists wanted the matter settled by a general synod, but the States General would not have it.Oldenbarneveldt, the Dutch liberal statesman, in 1608 gave both opponents opportunity to defend their views before the supreme court, and a verdict was pronounced that since the controversy had no bearing upon the main points pertaining to salvation, each should bear with the other.But Gomarus would not yield. The ministers in Leyden and other places took part in the controversy, which became general. A great excitement ensued in the university and the students were divided into two parties. Gomarus opposed him and published other theses.

Who Was Arminius Free Will Of

He denied neither God's omnipotence nor his free grace, but Arminius thought it his duty to save the honor of God, and to emphasize, on the basis of the clear expressions of the Bible, the free will of man as well as the truth of the doctrine of sin. He would not follow a doctrinal development which made God the author of sin and of the condemnation of men.Arminius taught conditional predestination and attached more importance to faith. The doctrine of predestination belonged to the fundamental teachings of the Reformed Church but the conception of it asserted by Calvin and his adherents Arminius could not make his own. On the whole these writings are a fine testimony to his learning and acumen. Works and Thought of Jacob ArminiusIn his Disputationes, which were partly published during his lifetime, partly after his death, and which included the entire department of theology, as well as in some discourses and other writings, Arminius had clearly and pointedly defined his position and expressed his conviction. The deliberations were first held orally, afterward continued in writing, but were terminated in October by the death of Arminius.

About the time of the Restoration, according to Hallam (Literary History of Europe, ii., London, 1855, p.131), the Arminians were called Latitude-men or Latitudinarians and were addicted to Greek philosophy and natural religion.During the eighteenth century Arminianism was advocated by many of the leading writers of Great Britain, Tillotson, Jeremy Taylor, Chillingworth, Burnet by Hoadly, a Socinian and by Whitby, John Taylor and Samuel Clarke, Arians. In England also it developed a strong affinity with Socinianism in its doctrine of God and the person of Christ, and with Pelagianism in its conception of human nature. In Holland it became allied with the more liberal tendencies,-Socinian, rationalistic, universalistic, thus withdrawing itself from the traditional interpretation of Christianity.The number of its professed adherents in that country (most of them in Amsterdam) is not large.

Arminianism became more a condition than a theory. To Jonathan Edwards its menace formed the motive for his greatest work, The Freedom of the Will.The name itself was made to cover many things for which Arminianism proper was not responsible-rationalistic tendencies of thought, depreciation of the serious nature of sin, indifference to vital piety, and laxity of morals. Owing to the writings of Whitby, John Taylor, and Samuel Clarke, its influence greatly increased in the eighteenth century.

A sign of the times is that theological schools confessedly Arminian educate young men for churches that are traditionally Calvinistic, and ministers holding Arminian views are received by such churches as thoroughly orthodox.- New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, Vol.